It’s clear to me there’s no observable knowledge the earth is anything other than a flat disk. Theories to the contrary are the products of the imagination and attempts to suggest curvature are deceptions without basis in observable fact. Photographs to the contrary have been manipulated by those intent on keeping us in ignorance.
If what we’ve been taught about something as basic as the shape of the earth is wrong one must question all such ‘common knowledge’: if the earth turns on an axis why don’t we feel the movement, the sun moves about the earth not the other way around, travel to the moon is a NASA deception. Our only true source of knowledge is the Bible that informs us of the ‘four corners of the earth (Rev 7:1), Psalms 96:10 tells us the earth is stationary, Daniel 4:10 speaks of a tree at the center of the earth visible to the earth’s ends.
And down the rabbit hole into the dark realm of conspiracy one falls vulnerable to grifters and scammers and crazies of all sorts, reinforced by like-minds on social media. Frightful to contemplate the numbers of those so enthralled. More frightful to realize this short post will only serve to reinforce flat earth beliefs.
deideismusings 
A good piece of ironic sarcasm. Thanks
I recently discussed the epistemology of Zeteticism that underlies the scientific aspect of Flat-Earth belief. I exclude for the sake of argument spiritual beliefs and conspiratorial thinking, but perhaps that needs dedicated consideration in the future.
Check it out if you are interested, not in *what* Flat-Earth proponents believe, but *why* they believe it. All the best!
I, of course was being facetious regarding the shape of the earth; all I can conjure is once one embraces the idea of wide-spread conspiracy all knowledge is open to question.
I figured about the tone and you are right about the conspiratorial thinking for sure. That kind of dogma is completely rudderless and will rationalise anything. Your post shines a light on the kind of faulty thinking that is prevalent.
But that’s why I recommended my article. It is interesting to take the “scientific” ones and understand their arguments on their terms – even though they still don’t work in the end.
One can find on-line a treatise by the original flat earther S B Rowbotham; thoughtfully pseudo-scientific still the question is begged: how to assume a belief so contrary to empirical evidence.